- Andrew Hedrick tournament results cover competitive Pokémon TCG events from several recorded seasons.
- Best recorded finish: A first-place Regional result in Orlando using Lugia and Archeops.
- Strongest period: The 2022–2023 season includes a win, a fifth-place Regional finish, and $13,500 in listed cash.
- Signature decks: Lugia/Archeops, Palkia Origin/Inteleon, Regidrago, and Dragapult/Dusknoir appear across the record.
- Current reference date: This article organizes the available player history as of August 31, 2026.
Andrew Hedrick tournament results at a glance
Andrew Hedrick tournament results show a progression from early online qualifiers to repeated high finishes at major Regional events and the North American International Championship. The available player record includes placements, deck archetypes, listed cash, and points for each recorded entry.
The clearest competitive peak is the 2022–2023 season. Hedrick placed fifth at the Peoria Regional before winning the Orlando Regional with Lugia and Archeops. The following season also remained strong, with a fourth-place Pittsburgh finish and a twelfth-place result in Toronto.
The highest recorded placement is 1st place at Regional Orlando, where Andrew Hedrick used a Lugia and Archeops deck and earned $5,000 with 27 points.
| Season | Recorded events | Best placement | Listed cash in entries | Listed points in entries |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019–2020 | 2 | 42nd | $0 | 16 |
| 2021–2022 | 2 | 21st | $750 | 22 |
| 2022–2023 | 2 | 1st | $5,750 | 45 |
| 2023–2024 | 2 | 4th | $7,000 | 36 |
| 2024–2025 | 2 | 12th | $3,000 | 32 |
| 2025–2026 | 2 | 29th | $1,000 | 24 |
The table totals only the individual event values displayed in the player history. It does not attempt to reinterpret the separate season summary figures shown on the record.
Best Finish
1st place at Regional Orlando stands as the strongest listed result.
Best Season
The 2022–2023 record combines a win, a fifth-place finish, and strong point totals.
Major Event
Hedrick also recorded a 53rd-place finish at NAIC 2022 in Columbus.
Season-by-season performance breakdown
The record covers six competitive seasons and illustrates a shift from online competition toward in-person Regional events. Early results came from the Limitless Online Series, while later entries center on Regionals and the North American International Championship.
When comparing seasons, placement is the most direct measure of tournament performance. Cash and points add useful context, but they should be read alongside event level and deck choice rather than treated as a single ranking system.
Use placement first, then compare event type, deck, listed cash, and points. A Regional result and an online qualifier should not be treated as equivalent tournament environments.
| Season | Event | Place | Deck | Cash | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019–2020 | Limitless Online Series Qualifier #1 | 42nd | Blacephalon | — | 8 |
| 2019–2020 | Limitless Online Series Qualifier #4 | 47th | Blacephalon | — | 8 |
| 2021–2022 | Regional Indianapolis | 21st | Arceus/Inteleon | $250 | 10 |
| 2021–2022 | NAIC 2022, Columbus | 53rd | Palkia Origin/Inteleon | $500 | 12 |
| 2022–2023 | Regional Peoria | 5th | Palkia Origin/Inteleon | $750 | 18 |
| 2022–2023 | Regional Orlando | 1st | Lugia/Archeops | $5,000 | 27 |
| 2023–2024 | Regional Pittsburgh | 4th | Lugia/Archeops | $5,000 | 24 |
| 2023–2024 | Regional Toronto | 12th | Comfey/Sableye | $2,000 | 12 |
| 2024–2025 | Regional Sacramento | 12th | Regidrago | $2,000 | 18 |
| 2024–2025 | Regional Toronto | 27th | Regidrago | $1,000 | 14 |
| 2025–2026 | Regional Monterrey | 29th | Dragapult/Dusknoir | $1,000 | 14 |
| 2025–2026 | Regional Pittsburgh | 60th | Dragapult/Dusknoir | — | 10 |
The full event history is available through the Andrew Hedrick tournament history page on Limitless. The page is the primary reference for the placements, deck labels, cash values, and points summarized here.
Deck choices across the tournament history
Andrew Hedrick’s recorded deck choices span several major Pokémon TCG archetypes. Blacephalon appears in the early online results, while Arceus/Inteleon and Palkia Origin/Inteleon define the next stage of the record. Lugia/Archeops then becomes the standout combination because it is associated with both a Regional victory and a fourth-place finish.
The later seasons show additional adaptation. Regidrago appears in both recorded Regionals during one season, followed by Dragapult/Dusknoir in the latest season listed in the reference record.
The available record identifies the deck archetypes but does not provide complete decklists. Treat these labels as historical archetype references, not as full competitive lists.
| Deck archetype | Recorded events | Best recorded finish | Associated seasons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blacephalon | 2 | 42nd | 2019–2020 |
| Arceus/Inteleon | 1 | 21st | 2021–2022 |
| Palkia Origin/Inteleon | 2 | 5th | 2021–2022, 2022–2023 |
| Lugia/Archeops | 2 | 1st | 2022–2023, 2023–2024 |
| Comfey/Sableye | 1 | 12th | 2023–2024 |
| Regidrago | 2 | 12th | 2024–2025 |
| Dragapult/Dusknoir | 2 | 29th | 2025–2026 |
Blacephalon
The earliest listed archetype, appearing in two online qualifiers.
Palkia Origin
Connected with a fifth-place Regional finish and a strong 18-point result.
Lugia/Archeops
The most successful recorded pairing, linked to first- and fourth-place finishes.
Regidrago
Used in two consecutive recorded Regional events during the 2024–2025 season.
The deck history is especially useful for readers studying how a competitive player’s results align with archetype selection. However, a deck alone does not explain a finish: tournament field strength, matchups, preparation, and execution also affect the outcome.
How to analyze a player tournament record
A tournament history is easiest to understand when each entry is reviewed using the same process. This approach separates raw results from interpretation and helps readers compare online qualifiers, Regionals, and international events without overstating any single statistic.
A reliable comparison should distinguish event scale, placement, deck archetype, cash, and points. Keeping these categories separate produces a clearer view of long-term performance.
Identify the event type
Start by determining whether the entry is an online qualifier, a Regional, or an international championship. Event type establishes the proper comparison group.
Record the placement
Note the finishing position before reviewing secondary statistics. The available history shows the most significant result as a first-place Regional finish in Orlando.
Match the deck archetype
Connect each result to its listed deck. This reveals repeated strategies, such as Lugia/Archeops appearing in two strong Regional performances.
Review cash and points
Use listed cash and points as supporting context. These values help distinguish close results but should not replace placement analysis.
Compare the season as a whole
Look for consistency across multiple events rather than judging a season from one tournament. This is particularly important for the later seasons with mixed finishes.
| Analysis category | Question to ask | Example from the record |
|---|---|---|
| Event type | What level of competition was entered? | Regional, NAIC, or online qualifier |
| Placement | How far did the run progress? | 1st, 4th, 5th, or another finish |
| Deck | Which archetype was used? | Lugia/Archeops or Regidrago |
| Cash | Was prize money listed? | $5,000 at Regional Orlando |
| Points | How many points were recorded? | 27 points at Regional Orlando |
This method is useful for both competitive research and fan documentation because it avoids treating every result as identical. It also makes updates easier when new tournament entries become available.
Key milestones and record checklist
Several milestones define the current profile. The early online results establish the beginning of the available record, while the later Regional results show repeated participation across North America. The Orlando victory is the central achievement, supported by the Peoria and Pittsburgh finishes.
The record includes one Regional win, two additional top-five Regional finishes, and multiple cash-earning results across later seasons.
Tournament History Checklist:
- Confirm the Orlando Regional first-place finish
- Review the Peoria fifth-place Regional result
- Compare the two Lugia/Archeops performances
- Track Regidrago and Dragapult/Dusknoir appearances
- Separate listed event cash from season summary totals
| Milestone | Result | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| First recorded events | Two online qualifiers | Establish the earliest listed competitive entries |
| First listed cash results | Indianapolis and NAIC 2022 | Mark the transition into major in-person events |
| Breakthrough season | 2022–2023 | Includes fifth place and a Regional win |
| Strong follow-up | Pittsburgh Regional | Fourth place with Lugia/Archeops |
| Latest listed season | 2025–2026 | Includes Monterrey and Pittsburgh Regionals |
The record also shows that performance can vary even when the same archetype is used. Dragapult/Dusknoir appears in both latest-season entries, with one result at 29th and another at 60th. That contrast reinforces why a deck label should be considered alongside tournament placement and event context.
FAQ about Andrew Hedrick tournament results
The questions below summarize the most useful takeaways from the available history and clarify how the listed statistics should be interpreted.
For future updates, compare new results against the existing benchmarks: 1st at Orlando, 4th at Pittsburgh, and 5th at Peoria.
Q: What is Andrew Hedrick's best recorded tournament result?
The best listed result is 1st place at Regional Orlando during the 2022–2023 season. The record associates that finish with Lugia/Archeops, $5,000 in listed cash, and 27 points.
Q: Which deck has Andrew Hedrick used most successfully?
Lugia/Archeops has the strongest recorded results. It appears with a first-place Regional finish in Orlando and a fourth-place Regional finish in Pittsburgh.
Q: Did Andrew Hedrick compete at NAIC?
Yes. The history lists a 53rd-place finish at NAIC 2022 in Columbus using Palkia Origin/Inteleon, with $500 in listed cash and 12 points.
Q: Where can I verify the tournament history?
The available reference is the Andrew Hedrick tournament history page on Limitless: https://limitlesstcg.com/players/2875/results. It contains the event rows, placements, deck labels, cash, and points.